![your opinion has been duly noted your opinion has been duly noted](https://i.imgflip.com/3py7ks.jpg)
The court twice took breaks during the hearing to deliberate, with the CJP.
#Your opinion has been duly noted full#
“Trustee” Punjab CM Hamza Shehbaz requests court to constitute a full bench to hear Elahi’s petition, clubbed with the review of SC’s interpretation of Article 63-A.PTI lawyer contends judicial interpretation of Article 63-A was clear and unambiguous.Court says facts in re-election case different from case on dissident MPAs.Justice Ahsan observes deputy speaker exceeded court’s interpretation in his ruling.
![your opinion has been duly noted your opinion has been duly noted](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/20/76/e3/2076e38b5935008b061ee2a3fc9a9fe2.jpg)
![your opinion has been duly noted your opinion has been duly noted](https://contenthub-static.grammarly.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/how-to-write-a-story-235x124.jpg)
The short order was announced after a marathon hearing that began at 1pm and lasted more than eight hours, during which time a three-member bench comprising Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar heard the arguments of government and its allies’ counsels, who repeatedly urged the top judge to constitute a full bench and prevent the case from being politicised. The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the coalition government’s request to form a full court bench on petitions related to the recently held Punjab chief minister’s re-election - including a review of its interpretation of Article 63-A.